Electronic Spies Like Us: Threats and Benefits of Open Source Intelligence in 2025

Written By Randall Stickley

CATs: OSINT, Analytic Tradecraft, Espionage, Great Power Competition, Counterintelligence, NATSEC

KIQs below**

KIQs:

  • How are adversarial nation-states (Russia, China, Iran) evolving their Open source intelligence (OSINT) capabilities to enhance cyber operations, counterintelligence, and influence campaigns in 2025?

  • What specific methods and technologies are being used by non-state actors, including terrorist organizations and cybercriminal networks, to exploit OSINT for operational planning and recruitment?

  • How effective are current AI-driven OSINT validation techniques in countering misinformation, disinformation, and deepfake manipulation in intelligence operations?

  • What regulatory and policy frameworks have been implemented by the US and allied nations to mitigate OSINT threats, and how do they impact intelligence-sharing and operational security?

  • How can public-private partnerships enhance OSINT collection, analysis, and security while balancing ethical concerns and counterintelligence risks?

Disclaimer: This report is based on OSINT gathered from publicly available sources. The analysis, findings, and conclusions presented herein are intended for informational purposes only and do not reflect official government policies or classified intelligence assessments. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, OSINT is inherently susceptible to misinformation, bias, and manipulation. The use of this report should be accompanied by independent verification and critical analysis. The authors and distributors of this document are not responsible for any misinterpretation, unintended use, or consequences resulting from reliance on the information contained within.

Executive Summary

OSINT is a vital tool across the US Intelligence Community (USIC), law enforcement, and private sector, enhancing situational awareness, cybersecurity, counterterrorism, and crisis response. Reports indicate that 80% of actionable intelligence in counterterrorism operations is sourced from OSINT, while its role in disaster response has improved emergency reaction times by 35%. However, adversarial states like Russia, China, and Iran increasingly exploit OSINT for cyber operations, espionage, and disinformation campaigns, with Russian-backed influence operations reaching tens of millions globally and Chinese economic espionage targeting over 200 Western firms in two years. Additionally, OSINT aids terrorist groups and cybercriminals in recruitment, planning, and misinformation. To mitigate these risks, intelligence agencies and businesses are integrating AI-driven validation methods, while governments are enforcing stricter policies and fostering public-private partnerships. A balanced approach that maximizes OSINT’s benefits while countering adversarial exploitation will be crucial to national security, corporate integrity, and global stability.

Findings and Analysis

OSINT has evolved into a vital discipline across the USIC, law enforcement, and the private sector. OSINT as a discipline has become the de facto solution for any information not labeled within a classified system or obfuscated by any state media. What many consider as open source data resides within the realm of publicly available information (PAI). Access to PAI is a continually expanding medium with advances in internet usage. Presently, an estimated 150 to 180 zettabytes of information are available in the PAI space; encompassing all manner of open sources and digital artifacts curated by humanity. Moreover, it is estimated that nearly 395 zettabytes of data will exist in this space by 2028 based on current data output trajectory as well as by the increasing use of IoT devices, social media, real-time data processing, and cloud-based storage. As information accessibility expands, OSINT provides unparalleled insights into geopolitical developments, security threats, and corporate risks. Moreover, the USIC now recognizes the power and utility of OSINT in crafting timely and actionable insights. As of December 2024, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) set forth Intelligence Community Standard 206-01 (ICS 206-01); enhancing the parameters and definitions of OSINT in sourcing of analytic products as established by Intelligence Community Directive 206 (ICD 206). However, the same tools that enhance national security and business intelligence also serve adversaries, including state and non-state actors. In 2025, the dual-edged nature of OSINT is more evident than ever, presenting both opportunities and significant security risks.

Benefits of OSINT

OSINT enhances situational awareness by allowing intelligence agencies, law enforcement, and corporations to monitor emerging threats in real time. Social media, public records, and commercial satellite imagery provide crucial intelligence for crisis management, counterterrorism, and geopolitical forecasting. Compared to traditional classified intelligence methods, OSINT reduces the cost of information acquisition, saving governments and corporations millions of dollars annually. Law enforcement agencies increasingly rely on OSINT to track extremist activity, criminal networks, and cyber threats. Businesses leverage OSINT to assess market conditions, identify cyber threats, mitigate risks in geopolitical situations, and monitor reputational risks, with many firms beginning to develop solutions for national security as well as proprietary interests Additionally, OSINT plays a crucial role in disaster relief by providing real-time data on natural disasters, conflict zones, and humanitarian crises.

  • A 2024 study by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) found that 80% of actionable intelligence used in counterterrorism operations originates from open sources.

  • In 2023 alone, OSINT was instrumental in disrupting over 300 cyberattacks targeting US infrastructure, according to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).

  • As of 2024, cybersecurity firms report that OSINT-based threat intelligence improves incident response efficiency by 60%.

  • The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) reported that OSINT-driven disaster response efforts reduced emergency reaction times by an average of 35%.

Threats Posed by OSINT

Despite its advantages, OSINT is increasingly exploited by adversarial nation-states such as Iran, Russia, and China for counterintelligence, propaganda, and cyber operations. Moscow integrates OSINT into hybrid warfare, using it to shape narratives, manipulate public opinion, and conduct influence operations. China employs OSINT for economic espionage, tracking technological advancements and identifying weaknesses in Western industries. Iran’s intelligence services use OSINT for domestic surveillance, targeting dissidents and monitoring foreign adversaries.

  • Per the 2024 ODNI Annual Threat Assessment, sources suggest adversarial nation-states could employ open source exploitation and cyber espionage as a means of both statecraft and spycraft for counterintelligence, maligned influence, and socio-economic supremacy.

  • In the 2024 European Union elections, Russian-backed disinformation campaigns reached over 50 million users through social media manipulation.

  • Various government agencies indicate that Chinese cyber espionage campaigns have targeted over 200 Western technology firms in the past two years. Such initiatives and cyber espionage campaigns align with China’s Thousand Talents Program to acquire, steal, and recruit adversarial technologies and workforce.

  • The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) highlights cyber units in Tehran that review public data to craft phishing campaigns, leading to a 40% increase in cyber intrusions targeting critical infrastructure between 2022 and 2024.

Non-state actors, including terrorist organizations and criminal enterprises, exploit OSINT for operational planning, recruitment, and propaganda. Additionally, OSINT raises privacy concerns as adversaries can leverage publicly available data to conduct doxxing, blackmail, and identity theft. 

  • Per the 2024 ODNI Annual Threat Assessment, non-state actors will continue to leverage open sources to refine cyber tradecraft in targeting critical infrastructure to extort funds, disrupt critical services, and expose sensitive data.

  • In 2024, Europol reported that 70% of terrorist plots in Europe involved OSINT for intelligence gathering.

  • The rise of AI-driven OSINT tools has also amplified the risk of deepfake-generated misinformation, with a recent MIT study finding that deep fakes are 80% more likely to be perceived as real when disseminated through social media and end-to-end encryption channels.

Mitigation Strategies and Future Considerations

To counter these threats, intelligence agencies and corporations are turning to AI and machine learning for OSINT validation. Enhanced AI-driven analytics can improve verification processes, reducing the impact of misinformation campaigns. Governments must establish robust policies to regulate OSINT collection, ensuring ethical practices while mitigating counterintelligence risks. Public-private partnerships between intelligence agencies, tech companies, and cybersecurity firms can enhance OSINT capabilities while minimizing vulnerabilities. Intelligence agencies and corporations must also implement stricter data access controls, train personnel on OSINT vulnerabilities, and use counter-surveillance techniques to protect sensitive information. Additionally, allied nations must coordinate OSINT best practices and threat intelligence sharing to counter state and non-state adversaries effectively.

Analysis

As OSINT continues to evolve in 2025, its benefits and threats remain closely intertwined. While it enhances intelligence collection, law enforcement, and business security, it also provides adversaries with powerful tools for espionage, cyber warfare, and influence operations. The key to maximizing OSINT’s advantages lies in implementing robust validation mechanisms, regulatory frameworks, and international cooperation. A strategic balance must be achieved between leveraging OSINT for security and risk mitigation while preventing its exploitation by adversaries. Failure to address these vulnerabilities will likely result in increased cyber threats, misinformation campaigns, and compromised intelligence operations. AI-driven validation techniques, enhanced intelligence-sharing agreements, and a focus on counterintelligence measures will be essential for safeguarding OSINT’s integrity.

The unregulated use of OSINT in counterintelligence and false flag operations presents a growing threat to national security and geopolitical stability. As adversaries refine their OSINT capabilities, the ability to manipulate publicly available data for deception and strategic misinformation increases. False flag operations leveraging OSINT can distort intelligence assessments, fabricate threats, and undermine democratic processes. Without regulatory oversight, adversarial actors can exploit OSINT to stage cyber incidents, fabricate conflicts, and create diversionary tactics aimed at misleading policymakers and military strategists.

A failure to anticipate the consequences of unregulated OSINT usage could lead to an environment where fabricated intelligence triggers unwarranted diplomatic or military responses. The absence of clear frameworks to validate OSINT findings may also facilitate large-scale influence campaigns that erode public trust in government institutions. Moving forward, intelligence agencies must prioritize countermeasures against OSINT-based deception, including advanced forensic analysis, multi-source verification, and coordinated response mechanisms to mitigate the risks of adversarial exploitation. Governments and international coalitions must also collaborate to establish global standards for OSINT regulation to prevent its misuse in hybrid warfare and disinformation campaigns.

Recommendations for OSINT Integration and Implementation

  • Agencies should develop specialized OSINT units trained in advanced data analysis, misinformation detection, and cyber threat assessment. AI-assisted tools should be implemented to enhance validation and verification of collected intelligence. Inter-agency collaboration and intelligence-sharing frameworks should be strengthened to improve operational effectiveness;

  • Corporations should establish OSINT teams to monitor cyber threats, brand reputation, and industry trends. Clear protocols for information verification must be enforced to prevent falling victim to misinformation campaigns. Businesses should also collaborate with cybersecurity firms to enhance threat intelligence and risk mitigation strategies;

  • Training in ethical OSINT collection, source verification, and analytical methodologies is essential. Analysts should leverage AI tools to filter out misinformation and cross-reference data across multiple sources to ensure accuracy. Operational security (OPSEC) measures must be practiced to protect personal data from adversarial exploitation;

  • Governments should establish legal frameworks to regulate OSINT use, preventing misuse in counterintelligence and false flag operations. Clear guidelines on ethical collection practices and responsible data handling must be set to balance intelligence-gathering with privacy concerns; AND,

  • Increasing public knowledge on OSINT risks, including misinformation and disinformation tactics, can help build societal resilience against adversarial influence operations. Media literacy programs should be introduced to educate individuals on identifying manipulated content and assessing the credibility of open source information.

Randall Stickley
Previous

ECHO Threat Assessment: Great Power Competition in the Arctic Region 2025
Next

China, Russia, and Iran Very Likely to Leverage Recent USG Layoffs for Human Source Targeting, Threatening US National Security